From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 24774 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2003 10:10:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 10:10:10 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.194.188]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id AWZ64077; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 12:09:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:10:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec@shout.net Message-Id: <9003-Sat11Jan2003120644+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200301102254.h0AMslR30036@duracef.shout.net> (message from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:54:47 -0600) Subject: Re: [rfa] gdb.texinfo: new release tarball commands Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200301102254.h0AMslR30036@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:54:47 -0600 > From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain > > Committed, with Eli Z's change of a period to a colon. > > Michael C > > 2003-01-09 Michael Chastain > > * gdbint.texinfo (Configuring @value{GDBN} for Release): Delete. > (Create a Release): Add new instructions for new @file{src-release}. > Document existing instructions for @file{Makefile.in} as > being for @value{GDBN} 5.3.1 or earlier. It's not necessary to use @-commands in the ChangeLog entries. In fact, it might be confusing. Btw, if "Configuring @value{GDBN} for Release" is the node name, it should be avoided: using @-commands in node names confuses TeX and might cause warnings from makeinfo. But since this node was deleted, I'm writing this just so we remember this in the future. Thanks.