From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5394 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2004 17:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5385 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 17:45:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 17:45:57 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.149.135]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DXY21042; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:45:43 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:45:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Chastain) Message-Id: <9003-Mon26Jul2004204354+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040726154838.4E0E44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (mec.gnu@mindspring.com) Subject: Re: [rfa/PROBLEMS] document threads/1650, thread internal error Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040726154838.4E0E44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:48:38 -0400 (EDT) > From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Chastain) > > Here is a PROBLEMS entry for gdb/1650, the internal error on > gdb.threads/manythreads.exp. Fine with me, thanks. > Not tested (don't know how to test ascii documentation). I think posting it here for review is all the ``testing'' it needs. > Okay to apply to gdb HEAD? > Okay to apply to gdb gdb_6_2-branch? Yes, to both, IMHO: documentation can never screw up anything. But I'll let Andrew to say the definitive YES/NO for the branch part.