From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15632 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2004 18:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2004 18:20:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2004 18:20:33 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.239]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BQB20754; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:17:45 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:20:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Paul Koning Message-Id: <9003-Fri23Apr2004211739+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: orjan.friberg@axis.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org In-reply-to: <16520.6116.810000.763508@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Paul Koning on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:07:16 -0400) Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <407282F4.2080602@axis.com> <20040406142228.GA29473@nevyn.them.org> <6654-Thu15Apr2004111217+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <407E8CEF.2050007@axis.com> <407FC69A.1000701@axis.com> <1438-Sat17Apr2004112204+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <4083E930.8040005@axis.com> <4087DFB6.1030801@axis.com> <3405-Thu22Apr2004213815+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <16520.6116.810000.763508@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:07:16 -0400 > From: Paul Koning > > Eli> I want to approve this, but first I'd like to refresh my memory > Eli> about the original patch. Could you please point me at the > Eli> message where Paul posted his patch and its reasons? > > Original message: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00506.html > > Further explanation: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00516.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00540.html > > Discussion about a testcase: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00546.html Thanks; I recollect that discussion now. Your patch is approved, please commit it. Thanks.