From: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: update 'target remote' description
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2776cb0603091005p22906cbao333e51f7e4da3b4b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ufylss05v.fsf@gnu.org>
On 3/8/06, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> > Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:27:45 -0800
> >
> >
> > src/gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> > 2006-03-07 Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
> >
> > * gdb.texinfo (Target Commands): Update text describing how to
> > specify a target. Refer to the detailed section on remote
> > debugging, not the brief mention.
>
> This is approved, but:
>
> > +@item target remote @var{medium}
> > +@cindex @code{target remote}
> > @cindex remote target
>
> Please remove this cindex entry. You already added such an entry
> where the detailed description of this command is given; having
> another one here is redundant, and even harmful, since this section
> doesn't really explain about the command.
Okay.
> > +@code{target remote} supports the @code{load} command. This is only
> > +useful if you have some other way of getting the stub to the target
> > +system, and you can put it somewhere in memory where it won't get
> > +clobbered by the download.
>
> I'm guessing that this paragraph might be important in some situation
> (which one, btw?), otherwise you wouldn't be adding it. So perhaps an
> index entry related to that situation would in order here. What
> phrases would a person who looks for this information have in mind?
Actually, I didn't add that: it's present in the current text. I
don't think it belongs there; I was simply avoiding moving it.
Ideally, I think the entry for 'target remote' in @section Commands
for managing targets should just be a brief reference to @chapter
Debugging remote programs, and @section Remote Debugging should be
removed, with all its content moved to @chapter Debugging remote
programs.
But I'd like to keep problems separate here. May I commit this
change, with the @cindex @code{target remote} omitted?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 10:57 Jim Blandy
2006-03-09 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-09 19:11 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2006-03-09 21:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-10 0:29 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f2776cb0603091005p22906cbao333e51f7e4da3b4b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox