Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror

Christopher Faylor
2006-02-10T16:18:03Z

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:53:10AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:37:19 -0500
>> From: Daniel Jacobowitz
>>
>> Anyway, here's a patch updated in every way I can think of to make it
>> less upsetting. Is this really better? Select to follow in the proper
>> thread.
>
>I'm fine with this, if this is the best compromise we can reach.

I'm wondering if a top-level "mingw" directory might simplify things here?
Could most of the Windows accommodations be put in an "external" library
and an external header file and just have gdb point to that?

cgf