From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27675 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2006 05:47:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 27663 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2006 05:47:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:47:38 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so1209228nzf for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.178.3 with SMTP id a3mr5637728nzf; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.42 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:47:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0601162147v597ba8d3ke75006a8ec11224d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:47:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Remove rdi-share Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200601162234.k0GMYHk7009713@sethra.codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601162234.k0GMYHk7009713@sethra.codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On 1/16/06, Mark Mitchell wrote: > As I understand it, consensus has been reached that rdi-share should > go away. In addition to removing cruft, this also makes it possible > to build an ARM GDB for MinGW; the rdi-share bits did not compile on > Windows. I've tested this patch by building an arm-eabi GDB for both > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and i686-mingw32 hosts. Should there be a NEWS entry for this?