From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31033 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2005 05:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 31024 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2005 05:55:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:55:14 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so191989nzf for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr1197825nzc; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.6 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:55:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511302155p28faa4e0j31512c1799bb5c93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:55:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gdb.asm/asm-source.exp for hppa64-hpux Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <438E8E5F.6070209@tausq.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <438E3C26.4010805@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511302141q6629a801laf783dcddb7a973d@mail.gmail.com> <438E8E5F.6070209@tausq.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On 11/30/05, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Is there a plausible place to put a comment explaining this constraint? > > I can add comments to common.inc, pa.inc/pa64.inc or asm-source.exp. Any > preferences? pa.inc/pa64.inc aren't good --- people working on other platforms will ignore those, but it's people on other platforms that we need to reach. common.inc seems like the right thing. If there were a skeleton .inc file, that'd be ideal.