From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16263 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2005 21:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16249 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2005 21:22:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.206) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:22:53 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so634497nzf for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.177.11 with SMTP id z11mr2356159nze; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.35 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:22:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511201322xc859b8esb81c38dfa93afad6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:52:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFA: GDB manual: document tracepoint packets Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8f2776cb0511191231y11805c1bqb4b4eb426b0e31fa@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511192143h21c1d647yc766a09e1bcc3184@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 On 11/20/05, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Should we perhaps say "(empty)" to prevent readers from thinking it's > a typo? You'll still get the single quotes around the thing, since it's a @table @samp. I think '' is pretty widely recognized. If you've looked at the way both @item and @item @r{(empty)} look in print and info, and you prefer the latter, I'd be happy to make the change.