From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20082 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2005 03:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20068 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2005 03:18:26 -0000 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:18:26 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so845519nzf for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.15.41 with SMTP id s41mr1939961nzi; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.35 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:18:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f2776cb0511111918q1050dbc0uc7577619031932ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:39:00 -0000 From: Jim Blandy To: Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [hppa] FYI: confusion in unwind descriptor field meaning Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109203108.GX1635@adacore.com> <43735815.3070805@tausq.org> <20051111001017.GJ1635@adacore.com> <437548AF.5090107@tausq.org> <8f2776cb0511111838m64d478d9s2e04db338fbf7fc8@mail.gmail.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 Just to be clear, though --- I think Dwarf CFI is preferable to prologue analysis. Even if we can do a decent job recovering unwinding data, the compiler actually *knows* it, and ought to just tell us.