From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4857 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2019 20:21:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4786 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2019 20:21:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=learn X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:21:04 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x1PKKv7B008923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:21:02 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2F9991E658; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:20:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA23E1E152; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:20:55 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:21:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Jordan Rupprecht Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, echristo@gmail.com, dblaikie@gmail.com, dje@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [dwarf2read] Fix crash when loading dwp files: calculate num_sections based on actual section indices, not just the number of sections. In-Reply-To: <20190225201715.144927-1-rupprecht@google.com> References: <439bf4f6859a539472a2e51a028b9503@polymtl.ca> <20190225201715.144927-1-rupprecht@google.com> Message-ID: <8f0931e519b511028022443a7edfad97@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00418.txt.bz2 On 2019-02-25 15:17, Jordan Rupprecht via gdb-patches wrote: > Don't know how I didn't see that. Now I don't need > get_largest_section_index() anymore. Thanks! > All your comments are basically not relevant any more :) Well, it's useful to learn for next time :). Are you going to send an updated version? Thanks, Simon