From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-135456-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 74193 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2016 16:11:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 74171 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2016 16:11:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:11:40 +0000
Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203])	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1cC7Tt-00003W-BA from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:11:37 -0800
Received: from [172.30.5.15] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:11:34 -0800
Reply-To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent turning record on while threads are running (PR 20869)
References: <20161129150758.29912-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <fef2bdd4-d5c8-14a8-73ed-329b27961f1b@codesourcery.com> <8b198908-9a78-d2e8-1726-a471d3afb9b7@ericsson.com> <b9d5bbc8-3656-d680-e1ae-0e2e342e1437@codesourcery.com> <9f8a9bbd-555a-bee8-52f8-46423702df95@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>,	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
CC: <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Message-ID: <8dca3464-d30d-be1f-c569-40307da10747@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:11:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9f8a9bbd-555a-bee8-52f8-46423702df95@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.201) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00996.txt.bz2

On 11/30/2016 09:36 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 04:47 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>> On 11/29/2016 10:42 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>> On 16-11-29 10:58 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>>>> +if ![supports_reverse] {
>>>>
>>>> Add an explicit untested call here?
>>>
>>> Right, adding:
>>>
>>> untested "reverse debugging not supported"
>
> Shouldn't it be "unsupported" ?
>

It does make more sense. But it is also untested, because it is unsupported.