From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id SYl5AElH3WiwURsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:22:49 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F1C851E0B6; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:22:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C111E047 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116B83857C4F for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:22:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 116B83857C4F Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174683858C24; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:22:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 174683858C24 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 174683858C24 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759332126; cv=none; b=bAwe7imFIAWY1NT7SeHFh4SydSQ4LfGiLTJNIu4y1tSEnVooVRWhqPOd34n+JoL+63Jw0kyCnmEio5bPK6wf4xk/OEFUGF5Q4aY1ltCq4R4pYlE6PIgnj9/ZD1QjCJ+JNMDoAyuDyuLmFjNB4iIHu6TFyr1jaYY1EFQYJzFoN9w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759332126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r5eHjDmVncYoQxDuT5iPKnQB2rQ2AjUnS0LGG6yI35I=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=gHvZKUkNwMqYORo7y5w6+bJnNHoqa6I6ZqdTjNopkGa7HUL9C7LL8Uu4jZ47Lm6mWuoDyiLrtGi9t8GyM84xVjdUgAi0paMRo44QgzZQAUASyaiag+Ijm11lUvghzyEh3+EdLpMWGVGbIqy4PAYl0qKrBaI/zi1szZgspZ8PURk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 174683858C24 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A744B1424; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.78.71] (e120077-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.78.71]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7B503F59E; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8c88bece-2961-48c2-bbaf-841dc0a62e92@arm.com> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:22:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] toplevel: unify the GCC and GDB/binutils .editorconfig files To: Simon Marchi , Jonathan Wakely Cc: Richard Earnshaw , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250923164959.565000-1-rearnsha@arm.com> <20250923164959.565000-2-rearnsha@arm.com> <38fb35da-a80d-467c-a8ec-15a398661890@simark.ca> <4dd1e712-38a2-49f4-ac5a-77ed54b58aa0@simark.ca> From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <4dd1e712-38a2-49f4-ac5a-77ed54b58aa0@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 01/10/2025 15:58, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 10/1/25 10:44 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 24/09/2025 09:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Sept 2025 at 18:11, Simon Marchi wrote: >>>> >>>> On 9/23/25 12:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>>>> Both GCC and GDB/binutils now have root editorconfig files. It would >>>>> make sense to unify them as this sets the general tone for these >>>>> projects. >>>>> >>>>> ChangeLog: >>>>> * .editorconfig: Unify the GCC and GDB/binutils root config. >>>> >>>> From the point of view of GDB, this looks fine, thanks for doing this. >>> >>> >>> This looks like a vast improvement on the bare-bones config I added >>> for GCC, thanks. >>> >> >> I've now pushed this to the GCC repo, but I've not yet heard anything from the binutils maintainers. Do I need to wait for them, or is Simon's ack for GDB enough? >> >> R. > > I think you can go ahead and push it, I really don't see how it could be > controversial. > > Simon Done. R.