From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id Kl9JEEFOjGDbbAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:49 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 347BD1F11C; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413A41E01F for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FA13847824; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:36:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 94FA13847824 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619807804; bh=JZrcUve5q9xp4sSyw8qTTcaaTsSF+0ZnjGNK0FO27oU=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=hoy2XCEaCz+uhlmv9TcCst77RrX8C02SKewCATWoNzu9s1t+4B60z9o0J2xNLP/HN gdl8+6L+Jxe7l44YiK7H3SCIwg62PBjcEopESSL3D8acC944/hpWleB/fmRU38sQg0 xHaO94yWiGZ9dr0SLjUUwg5pJLcmsP5FkHR8rBfo= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF03385742D; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:36:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3EF03385742D Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 13UIaVLt030856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:36 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 13UIaVLt030856 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BC4E1E01F; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:31 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: RFC: Changing AC_PROG_CC to AC_PROG_CC_C99 in top level configure To: Nick Clifton , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: Message-ID: <8c1b0ed9-e6f3-9c22-45c5-c2680a2a4830@polymtl.ca> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:36:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:36:31 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Binutils Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-04-26 7:32 a.m., Nick Clifton via Gdb-patches wrote:> Hi Guys, > > Given that gcc, gdb and now binutils are all now requiring C99 as a > minimum version of C, are there any objections to updating > configure.ac to reflect this ? > > Cheers > Nick > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index a721316d07b..59b4194fb24 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@ else > WINDMC_FOR_BUILD="\$(WINDMC)" > fi > > -AC_PROG_CC > +AC_PROG_CC_C99 > AC_PROG_CXX > > # We must set the default linker to the linker used by gcc for the correct Hi Nick, I think this fix is obvious enough, I encourage you to push it, that will fix the build failure many people get in opcodes/ppc-dis.c. We'll just remove the line later when we upgrade to Autoconf 2.71, as simple as that. For now we use 2.69. If that matters, you have my OK for the GDB side of things. Simon