On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I am checking in the appended.

gcc 4.5 gets ‘children_changed’ may be used uninitialized in this function,
even though update_dynamic_varobj_children sets it unconditionally,
seems conservative not to rely on the other function to initialize it
through the pointer passed.


09-19-2009  Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>

	* varobj.c (varobj_update): Initialize children_changed.