From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5205 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2009 06:14:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5187 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2009 06:14:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:14:27 +0000 Received: from spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.144]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n9M6EOJk022683 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:14:25 +0100 Received: from ywh10 (ywh10.prod.google.com [10.192.8.10]) by spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n9M6EMN3004284 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:14:22 -0700 Received: by ywh10 with SMTP id 10so6374521ywh.8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:14:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.20.4 with SMTP id x4mr5260403ani.93.1256192061799; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:14:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091022054758.GA15116@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <8ac60eac0910212148w24f44d53xfa6bedd7e12b41d1@mail.gmail.com> <20091022054758.GA15116@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0910212314h3517ff9btcad84f8d0978bddb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Fix for PR gdb/10819 From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches ml Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0050450295389cfd940476800115 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2 --0050450295389cfd940476800115 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-length: 512 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > I would find appropriate there a comment it is a Solaris bug workaround, the > condition looks to me as clearly redundant there now. Comment added. Should this patch (if approved) also go into gdb-7.0 branch? (It is clearly very safe.) Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov 2009-10-22 Paul Pluzhnikov PR gdb/10819 * dwarf2-frame.c (find_cie): Don't call bsearch on empty cie_table. --0050450295389cfd940476800115 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="gdb-pr10819-20091022.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdb-pr10819-20091022.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_g134asha0 Content-length: 842 LS0tIGR3YXJmMi1mcmFtZS5jLm9yaWcJMjAwOS0xMC0yMSAyMTozNDoyMC4w MDAwMDAwMDAgLTA3MDAKKysrIGR3YXJmMi1mcmFtZS5jCTIwMDktMTAtMjEg MjM6MTA6MjkuMDAwMDAwMDAwIC0wNzAwCkBAIC0xNTI1LDYgKzE1MjUsMTQg QEAgZmluZF9jaWUgKHN0cnVjdCBkd2FyZjJfY2llX3RhYmxlICpjaWVfdAog ewogICBzdHJ1Y3QgZHdhcmYyX2NpZSAqKnBfY2llOwogCisgIGlmIChjaWVf dGFibGUtPm51bV9lbnRyaWVzID09IDApCisgICAgeworICAgICAgLyogT24g U29sYXJpcyA4IGJzZWFyY2ggbWF5IGNhbGwgY29tcGFyaXNvbiBmdW5jdGlv biBldmVuIHdoZW4gZ2l2ZW4KKwkgYW4gZW1wdHkgdGFibGUuICBBcyBhIHdv cmsgYXJvdW5kLCBkb24ndCBjYWxsIGJzZWFyY2ggdW5kZXIgdGhlc2UKKwkg Y29uZGl0aW9ucy4gICovCisgICAgICByZXR1cm4gTlVMTDsKKyAgICB9CisK ICAgcF9jaWUgPSBic2VhcmNoICgmY2llX3BvaW50ZXIsIGNpZV90YWJsZS0+ ZW50cmllcywgY2llX3RhYmxlLT5udW1fZW50cmllcywKICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBzaXplb2YgKGNpZV90YWJsZS0+ZW50cmllc1swXSksIGJzZWFy Y2hfY2llX2NtcCk7CiAgIGlmIChwX2NpZSAhPSBOVUxMKQo= --0050450295389cfd940476800115--