From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30613 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2009 21:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 30589 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2009 21:28:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:28:31 +0000 Received: from wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.97]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n9ELST98003385 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:28:29 -0700 Received: from pxi34 (pxi34.prod.google.com [10.243.27.34]) by wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n9ELSQEu012045 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:28:26 -0700 Received: by pxi34 with SMTP id 34so166807pxi.8 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:28:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.85.16 with SMTP id n16mr1672941wal.123.1255555706155; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:28:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200910142216.46073.pedro@codesourcery.com> References: <20091013184120.30A5776761@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com> <200910142007.59636.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0910141401l57a6285es75634cf40ea5142d@mail.gmail.com> <200910142216.46073.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0910141428t428f0accqa16008c53cac5c16@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Fix for internal-error: linux_nat_post_attach_wait: Assertion `pid == new_pid && WIFSTOPPED (status)' failed. From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > I didn't mean to use those strings exactly. Please remove or replace > "During startup" with something else. We're attaching, not starting up. Oh, right. Sorry I missed that. I am having a bit of trouble coming up with the right verbiage. How about: error (_("Unable to attach: program exited normally.")); Alternatives: error (_("While attaching program exited normally.")); error (_("During attach program exited normally.")); don't sound grammatically correct to me (and a comma is probably missing from at least one of the above). Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov