From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24052 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2009 19:21:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 24044 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2009 19:21:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:20:58 +0000 Received: from spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.144]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n98JKuQb011964 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:20:56 -0700 Received: from yxe8 (yxe8.prod.google.com [10.190.2.8]) by spaceape10.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n98JKRO1010021 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:20:53 -0700 Received: by yxe8 with SMTP id 8so6840451yxe.17 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.166.10 with SMTP id t10mr1769114ano.143.1255029653213; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091008190516.GA23318@caradoc.them.org> References: <20090902163344.833F476568@localhost> <200910070044.24367.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0910061726n18f8fa9cnea4ddd25d55fe315@mail.gmail.com> <200910081906.38504.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20091008190516.GA23318@caradoc.them.org> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0910081220h47064bq1977dad0f8194075@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Allow gdbserver to dynamically lookup libthread_db.so.1 From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Pedro Alves , Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > How horrid would it be to support both modes of operation? I think this can be done fairly easily via configure option. I would prefer to do it as a follow-up patch though. Would that be ok? Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov