From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25941 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 17:19:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 25930 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2009 17:19:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:19:17 +0000 Received: from spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n8EHJFZ8018479 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700 Received: from yxe36 (yxe36.prod.google.com [10.190.2.36]) by spaceape23.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n8EHJCxt024318 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:19:12 -0700 Received: by yxe36 with SMTP id 36so4058302yxe.11 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.88.18 with SMTP id q18mr6491520anl.64.1252948752185; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909141643.n8EGhjgm021351@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <8ac60eac0909131447i5a128877q585e3ab4c24f551b@mail.gmail.com> <200909141643.n8EGhjgm021351@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0909141019x77435f40p32f731dfd9df0abc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Joel Brobecker , Pierre Muller , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches ml , Tom Tromey , Jan Kratochvil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I've tested this together with the lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc > patch on spu-elf, and it fixes all overlay-related bugs and > introduces no regressions, so it looks good to me as well. Thanks, I've just checked in both patches. Hopefully this thread will end here, it's been long enough :-) -- Paul Pluzhnikov