From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2632 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2009 17:58:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 2624 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2009 17:58:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:57:54 +0000 Received: from wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.88]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n7KHvoEe022055 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:57:50 +0100 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rvfb17.prod.google.com [10.140.179.17]) by wpaz24.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n7KHvlvc002922 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so22557rvf.50 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.166.20 with SMTP id o20mr71990rve.75.1250791067275; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8ac60eac0908171415m47d28495t5311a0d2c7616922@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0908201057y44de0b84gdf193f2e2a81bc68@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches ml , Tom Tromey Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=000e0cd2e35440d2fc0471967d2d X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 --000e0cd2e35440d2fc0471967d2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 589 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > For overlay sections, find_pc_section would > delegate its work to find_pc_mapped_section anyway: Thanks, I understand how that works now. > I'd be happy to test patches on the SPU ... Could you please test attached patch? I believe it is correct to simply not insert any overlay sections into the section map. Tested on Linux/x86_64 with no new failures. Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov 2009-08-20 Paul Pluzhnikov * objfiles.c (update_section_map): Skip overlay sections. --000e0cd2e35440d2fc0471967d2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="gdb-find_pc_section-20090820.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdb-find_pc_section-20090820.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_fylsgowy0 Content-length: 989 SW5kZXg6IG9iamZpbGVzLmMKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpSQ1Mg ZmlsZTogL2N2cy9zcmMvc3JjL2dkYi9vYmpmaWxlcy5jLHYKcmV0cmlldmlu ZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjkyCmRpZmYgLXUgLXAgLXUgLXIxLjkyIG9iamZpbGVz LmMKLS0tIG9iamZpbGVzLmMJMTcgQXVnIDIwMDkgMTE6MTY6MTMgLTAwMDAJ MS45MgorKysgb2JqZmlsZXMuYwkyMCBBdWcgMjAwOSAxNzo0Nzo1NiAtMDAw MApAQCAtODM3LDkgKzgzNywxMCBAQCB1cGRhdGVfc2VjdGlvbl9tYXAgKHN0 cnVjdCBvYmpfc2VjdGlvbiAqCiAgIG1hcCA9ICpwbWFwOwogICB4ZnJlZSAo bWFwKTsKIAotI2RlZmluZSBpbnNlcnRfcChvYmpmLCBzZWMpIFwKLSAgKChi ZmRfZ2V0X3NlY3Rpb25fZmxhZ3MgKChvYmpmKS0+b2JmZCwgKHNlYyktPnRo ZV9iZmRfc2VjdGlvbikgXAotICAgICYgU0VDX1RIUkVBRF9MT0NBTCkgPT0g MCkKKyNkZWZpbmUgaW5zZXJ0X3Aob2JqZiwgc2VjKQkJCQkJCVwKKyAgKHNl Y3Rpb25faXNfbWFwcGVkIChzZWMpID09IDAgJiYJCQkJCVwKKyAgICgoYmZk X2dldF9zZWN0aW9uX2ZsYWdzICgob2JqZiktPm9iZmQsIChzZWMpLT50aGVf YmZkX3NlY3Rpb24pCVwKKyAgICAgJiBTRUNfVEhSRUFEX0xPQ0FMKSA9PSAw KSkKIAogICBtYXBfc2l6ZSA9IDA7CiAgIEFMTF9PQkpTRUNUSU9OUyAob2Jq ZmlsZSwgcykK --000e0cd2e35440d2fc0471967d2d--