From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24226 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2009 21:15:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 24217 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2009 21:15:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:15:27 +0000 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n7HLFNxC024692 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:15:23 +0100 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rvbf25.prod.google.com [10.140.82.25]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n7HLFK1i000970 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:15:20 -0700 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so484435rvb.0 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:15:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.161.14 with SMTP id j14mr1096249rve.246.1250543720145; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:15:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200908171954.n7HJsPRh012287@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <200908171927.n7HJRYPE029205@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200908171954.n7HJsPRh012287@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0908171415m47d28495t5311a0d2c7616922@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Speed up find_pc_section From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Section can partially overlap with overlays ... Yes, the same thing also is happening on Darwin; some discussion here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-08/msg00201.html The thing is: when the assumptions are violated, (AFAICT) find_pc_section couldn't have worked correctly before my patch, except by accident. What is the simplest way to test overlays? Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov