From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3598 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 14:36:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 3582 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 14:36:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:36:14 +0000 Received: from wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.85]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5TEaAOv006295 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:36:11 +0100 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qwf5.prod.google.com [10.241.194.69]) by wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5TEa8EK015520 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:36:08 -0700 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so570650qwf.32 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:36:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.13 with SMTP id f13mr1549162qcn.36.1246286168190; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:36:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0906221321r45c43a13g87a830f8dd3487ea@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090605222214.66E2976BC4@localhost> <8ac60eac0906151139w23c6cc2ag9307d73232753f65@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0906220910p5750f455u1e3dc462035d50b6@mail.gmail.com> <4A3FC8CA.5070700@vmware.com> <8ac60eac0906221321r45c43a13g87a830f8dd3487ea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906290736g4206c05dp95f3bc7ca0832551@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Fix for gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp failure on Linux From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Cc: "dje@google.com" , Michael Snyder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00812.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Michael Snyder wrote: > >> Have you, or could you, run regression testing in i686? > > This is glibc-version related, rather than x86_64 vs. i686: Ping? Ping? Ping? -- Paul Pluzhnikov