From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6821 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2009 20:50:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 6808 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2009 20:50:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:50:36 +0000 Received: from zps78.corp.google.com (zps78.corp.google.com [172.25.146.78]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n5RKoXNf023490; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:50:33 -0700 Received: from qyk17 (qyk17.prod.google.com [10.241.83.145]) by zps78.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n5RKoU8N001126; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:50:30 -0700 Received: by qyk17 with SMTP id 17so1709270qyk.9 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.89.202 with SMTP id f10mr1325531qcm.71.1246135830136; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83prcp4dci.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8ac60eac0906271144k61bbb6e3sc092d2780dc4192e@mail.gmail.com> <83prcp4dci.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0906271350o544d5f73i646caa1d29eb24a0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Remove unimplemented MI commands [Re: Learn function name by its address] From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, andre.poenitz@nokia.com, gdb@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00773.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry, no (for this part). =A0I asked to leave the text there, just > commented away with @ignore..@end ignore. Shouldn't we be consistent? If this constitutes "unwanted clutter" in the code, surely it also does in the docs? > Some of the text you > removed was already either @ignore'd or commented out, actually. Yes, I understand that much :-) > And in any case, please state in the ChangeLog entry the names of the > nodes where you make your changes. =A0A file name alone is not enough. Ok. --=20 Paul Pluzhnikov