From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14026 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2009 18:03:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 13145 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2009 18:03:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:03:09 +0000 Received: from wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.69]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n3JI361H030976 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:03:06 -0700 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qwj9.prod.google.com [10.241.195.73]) by wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n3JI34tp023518 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:03:05 -0700 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 9so696478qwj.46 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.32.66 with SMTP id b2mr5493265qad.8.1240164184768; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1240153134.19777.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090406203920.CCD6F19C4EC@localhost> <1239225742.8871.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> <8ac60eac0904101205h76d8377cv843db8177e74f8af@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0904171213p4c075224x5f5c3661d240f383@mail.gmail.com> <1240153134.19777.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0904191103w4967d874n284acebc8e7a2ece@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Allow GDB to search for the right libthread_db.so.1 From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches ml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > My only comment is that you are using dladdr, which is a glibc extension. I am not adding this as a new dependency though; currently checked source already depends on it. > But do we care about Linux systems with other libc implementations > (e.g., diet libc, uClibc ? AFAICT, both diet libc and uClibc have it (uClibc only if it has shared library support compiled in; but if it doesn't, then libthread_db isn't usable anyway). -- Paul Pluzhnikov