From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1508 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2009 22:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 1497 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2009 22:59:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.45.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:59:42 +0000 Received: from wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.97]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n1IMxeSJ014929 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:59:40 -0800 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wfg23.prod.google.com [10.142.7.23]) by wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n1IMxc5X019870 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:59:38 -0800 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so146371wfg.0 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:59:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.134.17 with SMTP id h17mr3894288wfd.267.1234997978195; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:59:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0902181458g39dfbce9k63c3329528b0aad5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090205030257.8A6073A6B7A@localhost> <8ac60eac0902061837p5885b812j8a26669e799702e1@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0902181458g39dfbce9k63c3329528b0aad5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8ac60eac0902181459q46e26f3fjc2f3fea471b1353a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] Fix a crash when displaying variables from shared library. From: Paul Pluzhnikov To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > I've updated the patch to only clear displays which actually are > about to become dangling, and extended the test to check that displays > that refer to the main executable are not affected. Forgot to mention: regtested on Linux/x86_64 with no regressions. Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov