From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23771 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2008 22:28:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23763 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2008 22:28:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:27:04 +0000 Received: from wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.85]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m99MQn9e011980 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:26:50 +0100 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wagn4.prod.google.com [10.114.215.4]) by wpaz21.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m99MQctm002594 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:26:48 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so124423wag.5 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr988925waa.53.1223591208000; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.78.12 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8ac60eac0810091526x2eda68fascda983324d047be@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:28:00 -0000 From: "Paul Pluzhnikov" To: "Michael Snyder" Subject: Re: Results of macscp.exp test on cygwin Cc: "Tom Tromey" , "Pierre Muller" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <48EE6707.3050401@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <011801c92a03$4b71afa0$e2550ee0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20081009181350.GA15369@caradoc.them.org> <48EE6707.3050401@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Michael Snyder wrote: > Regarding macscp.exp, I am running it on RHEL-4 and seeing > the majority of tests fail. I've seen these tests fail when switching from gcc-4.2.1 to gcc-4.3.1, due to a bug in gcc (macro definitions had bogus line numbers). Perhaps your 'gcc' is similarly broken? What does 'readelf -w a.out | grep DW_MACINFO_start_file' say? Fix for gcc-4.3 is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00726.html -- Paul Pluzhnikov