From: "Paul Pluzhnikov" <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "Doug Evans" <dje@google.com>
Subject: [RFA] Patch for incorrect handling of references to pointers [pr1147]
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 01:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ac60eac0805081418md64f7bcha08664e9554e5750@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 567 bytes --]
Greetings,
Attached patch fixes incorrect handling of "this" when reference
to pointer is used:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&database=gdb&pr=1147
and adds a test case for it.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
ChangeLog:
2008-05-08 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
* gdb/valopts.c (find_overload_match): Handle references
to pointers.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2008-05-08 Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
* gdb.cp/call-c.exp: Test for incorrect handling of reference
to pointer.
* gdb.cp/call-c.cc: Likewise.
[-- Attachment #2: patch-1147.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1227 bytes --]
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/call-c.cc.orig 2008-05-08 14:01:57.000000000 -0700
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/call-c.cc 2008-05-08 13:40:09.851165000 -0700
@@ -21,7 +21,18 @@ int func(int x)
return x;
}
+struct Foo {
+ Foo() : x_(1) { }
+ int func() const { return x_; }
+ private:
+ int x_;
+};
+
int main()
{
+ Foo f;
+ Foo *pf = &f;
+ Foo* &rf = pf;
+ rf->func();
return func(0);
}
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/call-c.exp.orig 2008-05-08 14:01:57.000000000 -0700
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/call-c.exp 2008-05-08 13:54:14.497857000 -0700
@@ -44,3 +44,6 @@ gdb_load ${binfile}
runto_main
gdb_test "print foo(1)" "\\\$$decimal = 1"
+send_gdb "next\nnext\nnext\n"
+gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $"
+gdb_test "print rf->func()" "\\\$$decimal = 1"
--- gdb/valops.c.orig 2008-05-08 14:01:57.000000000 -0700
+++ gdb/valops.c 2008-05-08 13:57:14.320875000 -0700
@@ -1919,7 +1919,8 @@ find_overload_match (struct type **arg_t
if (objp)
{
if (TYPE_CODE (value_type (temp)) != TYPE_CODE_PTR
- && TYPE_CODE (value_type (*objp)) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ && (TYPE_CODE (value_type (*objp)) == TYPE_CODE_PTR
+ || (TYPE_CODE (value_type (*objp)) == TYPE_CODE_REF)))
{
temp = value_addr (temp);
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 1:53 Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2008-05-17 13:58 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-05-28 6:52 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-06-05 1:19 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-06-05 20:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-06 0:52 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
2008-06-06 2:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-06 18:32 ` Paul Pluzhnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ac60eac0805081418md64f7bcha08664e9554e5750@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox