From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15081 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2008 17:51:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 15071 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2008 17:51:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:51:37 +0000 Received: from zps75.corp.google.com (zps75.corp.google.com [172.25.146.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m3MHpVZY019261 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:51:31 +0100 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gvfp33.prod.google.com [10.16.192.33]) by zps75.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m3MHpRq4025621 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:51:30 -0700 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p33so317031gvf.22 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.150.13 with SMTP id c13mr590080ybo.168.1208886689331; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.39.20 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8ac60eac0804221051p6ad56743g202a6f920d1c6315@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:05:00 -0000 From: "Paul Pluzhnikov" To: "Paul Pluzhnikov" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb could leave inferior running as a background process In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0804220946r689605e1pd4803c2aea3a9e07@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8ac60eac0804220741g6b830620h6f83c627fb00474b@mail.gmail.com> <20080422155548.GA13076@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0804220946r689605e1pd4803c2aea3a9e07@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > Would attached patch work better then? Actually, the second patch doesn't fix the problem by itself: inferior is resumed, then warning is issued, then we block. So both the first and second patches are needed. Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov