From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21085 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 00:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21078 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 00:58:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 00:58:51 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8A11Df5028461 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:58:50 -0700 Received: from [17.201.22.21] (moleja.apple.com [17.201.22.21]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8A0wmvs025151; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:58:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4140FB80.nail29R1BD8KR@mindspring.com> References: <76449857-01CD-11D9-9838-000A9569836A@apple.com> <414069F8.nailE691CTVHR@mindspring.com> <4140FB80.nail29R1BD8KR@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v672) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8E5F59DB-02C4-11D9-9D0C-000A9569836A@apple.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Molenda Subject: Re: RFA: if/while commands in user-defined command behave differently Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:58:00 -0000 To: Michael Chastain X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 On Sep 9, 2004, at 5:55 PM, Michael Chastain wrote: > Jason Molenda wrote: >> OK, I switched to gdb_test_multiple, thanks for the feedback. I >> haven't used gdb_test_multiple before, but I think this patch is >> correct. > > Just assert that you re-tested it, and it's approved. > (I'm a weird combination of anal-retentive and trusting). Yes, sorry, x86 Linux gcc 3.4.0 dwarf2, no failures (with the patch to cli-script.c, of course :) >> I haven't heard anything back on the CLI change. If the testsuite >> change is approved, should I commit that and file a PR to track the >> bug? :-) > > Actually, I like it that way. But you've been working on GDB longer > than I have, so I leave it to your judgement when/if to file a PR. Cool. I have to take off in a few minutes, but I'll file a PR and commit the testsuite addition tomorrow. Thanks again for the help, J