From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74365 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2017 18:55:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 74356 invoked by uid 89); 10 Mar 2017 18:55:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:4f9a4e5, _different_, secret X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:55:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C4A80470 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v2AItF8R032301; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [pushed] Fix PR tui/21216: TUI line breaks regression To: Jan Kratochvil References: <1488932352-10885-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <20170309230359.GA503@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20170310125946.GA508@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20170310140450.GA5206@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4593d5aa-00c7-75a9-9fc6-b65bddad0c0a@redhat.com> <20170310172744.GA7009@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4f9a4e59-ccc8-9d6e-7ce2-f030f6efe184@redhat.com> <20170310184637.GA20146@host1.jankratochvil.net> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <89a44793-33db-6f95-a0b0-a51b0e1c2d11@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170310184637.GA20146@host1.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 On 03/10/2017 06:46 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >>> and you were right, there are other debuggers which >>> already do it the right way. >> >> I don't think I ever said such a thing. > > You said something different although IMO with the same practical result. That's an incorrect interpretation. > This text from an internal list but I do not find that too secret: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:44:11 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > # Basically you're saying we should rewrite the whole CLI from scratch. > # And it basically seems like writing a _different_ debugger from > # scratch to me. That I did say, but that "different" meant that it'd be a different debugger in the user's perspective and in the use cases that it could support. E.g., how with separate components in separate processes you can't have an single integrated Python API. Thanks, Pedro Alves