From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id NI68N82gO2lrXjgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:57:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1765515469; bh=f63vmbDMjHVELNYm/+1rXaubS8wNOBVFC7A+4hQAJ5U=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=rjQN5apYNkAoemtUPi3tSOK4W8BxnumGkevzWIg4EAJSb7/bbYxBv8CgZZc02Kdei KV9Ospc1cuq06jXbHCsYbVPO5pEbAKQ/1YSisohPNMyK1tD0eXm9i/ZBugA1Gmp8aO keG4j0WdoO4hcQe0TK1JIpO2br72uwKizTXoRN7o= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D6C1D1E048; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:57:49 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=H1VEjLQ0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 605041E048 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:57:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F169E4BA2E24 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 04:57:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F169E4BA2E24 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=H1VEjLQ0 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE6964BA2E1F for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 04:57:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BE6964BA2E1F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BE6964BA2E1F Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1765515423; cv=none; b=UpFamR4SNjhF0mxn5bf6OfWsgv1IZrW31yxDdRgqLWPT+xCtJcAXcDwVEWtjfahWADnI/cfv0rKCj4Bi0EGlN1rRjhzArL5vNLjkEsU5oGONBePc+oKoT4zyohYnrRluYaOQ8UyHQ5o9jqbExO1Y/nBiPn9RBTIxmnWFYBdLEfg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1765515423; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f63vmbDMjHVELNYm/+1rXaubS8wNOBVFC7A+4hQAJ5U=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=nrHIm1gFsvdUV6vFD5yBommnQ/yFD5ERz3iZ3spN+F0cEfsWjr4boyVlLDSkIV1Zt3u81S2Rpy5Rj1pS5YJBTiDv6uho2JTfzYa0c6tku0TDEsZ11rZKzqZsssCvM3tFoNiTvrNxgIzq6wSZbENrJqIcMFlM+dnGMZqkuF+hjto= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE6964BA2E1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1765515423; bh=f63vmbDMjHVELNYm/+1rXaubS8wNOBVFC7A+4hQAJ5U=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=H1VEjLQ0On1fab86AAyNbWgusqiPegtBpY8E6m/EHQQuWRSmIoXaUg4gR9TosZ9IC GEkIk40rT6qmrXsZaoORKcZD4zAYo6CxT0Q5RxN9WLwPx8O9BEfc/6557Q3SlbMrtN 55CFEcJc+KSRKoqA3a3x5F8ZN2qv3Z4XIcO4z8ho= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 2DCD01E048; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:57:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <8995a60f-fa36-4de7-ba91-8319c0b56ae2@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:57:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/44] gdb, infrun, ze: allow saving process events To: Tankut Baris Aktemur , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Markus Metzger References: <20250801-upstream-intelgt-mvp-v3-0-59ce0f87075b@intel.com> <20250801-upstream-intelgt-mvp-v3-12-59ce0f87075b@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20250801-upstream-intelgt-mvp-v3-12-59ce0f87075b@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2025-08-01 05:37, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote: > From: Markus Metzger > > When a process stop reply is encountered during stop_all_threads (), a new > thread with the process' ptid is created and the waitstatus is saved in > that thread. The effect is that we have a thread with a process ptid and > we dropped the event. > > Save the waitstatus in the inferior, prevent that inferior from resuming, > and return it on the next wait. Can you clarify what a process-wide event is? Are there instances where a target returns that today, or is something new with intelgt? Simon