From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86001 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2017 15:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 85979 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2017 15:55:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:55:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDEEE6147C; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:55:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com CDEEE6147C Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=palves@redhat.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4638A21A6; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [AArch64][6/6] Core file support for "pauth" feature To: Yao Qi References: <20170810212238.GE8039@1170ee0b50d5> <26b4881d-bec9-e2a6-fe96-13f2a44f7b1f@redhat.com> <20170810220402.GF8039@1170ee0b50d5> <20170811153815.GJ8039@1170ee0b50d5> Cc: Jiong Wang , GDB , Binutils From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <893207e9-c9ec-207c-5cc9-a9bd2da1bfc9@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170811153815.GJ8039@1170ee0b50d5> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 On 08/11/2017 04:38 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 17-08-10 22:04:02, Yao Qi wrote: > How about we unconditionally define HWCAP_ARM64_APIA in aarch64-linux-tdep.c? > WDYT? > > #define HWCAP_ARM64_APIA (1 << 16) > Agreed, because that's essentially what I was suggesting. :-) The difference was that I was suggesting 'AARCH64_ + $org_name', to follow the scheme of all other GDB-invented Aarch64-related macro symbols. AARCH64_HWCAP_APIA seems more clearly to me a gdb-replacement name, than HWCAP_ARM64_APIA. I could totally see someone confusing the latter for a real kernel-defined name, since it follows the scheme of other ports. But that's obviously a minor thing. Thanks, Pedro Alves