From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5117 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2012 18:07:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 5107 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2012 18:07:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1AI7hsk018926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:07:43 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1AI7gtH000486; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:07:43 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1AI7eHt006738; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:07:41 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [no-commit-intention] Naive unnamed fields for main_type [Re: [patch] Fix gdb-gdb.py for flds_bnds copy-pastes] References: <20120209092727.GA2664@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120209093119.GA2722@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120209151621.GB3474@adacore.com> <4F341D1E.3090206@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F341D1E.3090206@earthlink.net> (Stan Shebs's message of "Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:23:10 -0800") Message-ID: <87zkcqd0k3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs writes: Stan> We should at least build with the standard native compiler on our Stan> supported systems, but should feel free to use whatever flags. Stan> Did any of the proprietary workstation compilers totally miss the Stan> C99 boat? Perhaps people with access to these machines could try it and report back. Stan> 3) Libraries/headers. This is probably the most common way that Stan> people get hosed - their GCC is modern, but library and headers are Stan> several generations older, and possibly lacking C99-required bits. I'm not so concerned about this. We already have configure and we can also import things from gnulib. Tom