From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 (was: [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none)
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zkca9azw.fsf@schwinge.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120216182544.36b41a1b@mesquite.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]
Hi Kevin!
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:25:44 -0700, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:32:18 +0100
> Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> > I now have (on a SH7785-based board). My patch fixes a few more failures
> > than yours. ;-P
>
> This will require more study and discussion then. I tested against
> the simulator using the default multilib.
How do you configure the toolchain's components for the sim testing?
And, any quick suggestion for a sh64 sim testing configuration, too? My
attempt so far only results in a series of SIGILL...
Grüße,
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-15 14:00 [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-15 14:54 ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-16 15:27 ` [PATCH] [SH] GDB crash in sh_is_renesas_calling_convention, TYPE_CALLING_CONVENTION (was: Prologue skipping if there is none) Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-16 19:38 ` [PATCH] [SH] GDB crash in sh_is_renesas_calling_convention, TYPE_CALLING_CONVENTION Tom Tromey
2012-02-15 16:09 ` [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none Kevin Buettner
2012-02-16 0:13 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-16 16:59 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-17 2:30 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-20 16:19 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-21 5:25 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-24 11:09 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-24 22:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-29 13:51 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-01 0:13 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-03-01 9:03 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-01 9:00 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-02 0:19 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-03-02 11:18 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-02 12:01 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-02 14:15 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-06 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-03 1:18 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-03-05 15:16 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-05 19:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-21 15:23 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-22 14:54 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2012-02-22 16:56 ` Simulator testing for sh and sh64 (was: [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none) Kevin Buettner
2012-02-22 19:33 ` Simulator testing for sh and sh64 Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-23 0:35 ` Kaz Kojima
2012-02-24 21:38 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-23 19:55 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-23 22:53 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-02-24 11:12 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-23 23:57 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zkca9azw.fsf@schwinge.name \
--to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox