From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8354 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2012 20:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7976 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2012 20:34:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:34:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q79KYUMd001247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:34:30 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q79KYSZb031038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:34:29 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] gdb: add completion handler for "handle" References: <201208012353.56496.vapier@gentoo.org> <201208012358.18948.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201208012358.18948.vapier@gentoo.org> (Mike Frysinger's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2012 23:58:18 -0400") Message-ID: <87zk63by97.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes: Mike> + c = add_com ("handle", class_run, handle_command, _("\ Mike> +Handle signals: handle SIGNAL [KEYWORDS]\n\ Mike> Args are signals and actions to apply to those signals.\n\ Mike> Symbolic signals (e.g. SIGSEGV) are recommended but numeric signals\n\ I didn't see this in v3, but FWIW it is normal-ish now to add a usage line. Say, something like: Change the way GDB handles signals. Usage: handle SIGNAL [SIGNAL | KEYWORD]... ... or whatever. Tom