Re: [3/3] RFC - optional patch to restore DW_AT_data_member_location

Tom Tromey
2012-09-12T14:26:07Z

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> I see I did not make clear why I like the reproducibility of the
Jan> compilation. This is because sometimes it is good to know what was
Jan> hand-edited in the file and I find a bit excessive to keep both the
Jan> original and the hand-edited .S files in the repository due to it.
Jan> This is why I sometimes did #if 0-#else-#endif or #if 0-#endif-#if
Jan> 1-#endif constructs in the .S files (I see it now only in
Jan> gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S).

Ok.

Jan> I sure do not insist on anything like that, just FYI.

I'll at least add some comments to the .S.
I suppose this is another way that having a DWARF assembler would be
preferable.

Tom