Re: [3/3] RFC - optional patch to restore DW_AT_data_member_location

Joel Brobecker
2012-09-02T15:04:59Z

> The use case is that if not upstreamed I will have to continue carrying on the
> patch up to date with HEAD for many further years for compatibility with
> gfortran-4.1 in RHEL-5.y.
>
> Sure it may not be compelling for FSF GDB, I am fine with that.

Personally, I think it is potentially helpful to have it in the FSF
tree unless it causes problems. I can certainly see someone upgrading
their GDB from source, while still using the compiler provided by the
system.

--
Joel