From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24085 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2012 15:42:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 23949 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2012 15:42:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:42:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQFgKGP013572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:42:21 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQFgJ2o031217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:42:20 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Misc annotations changes. References: <50ACF672.7060607@redhat.com> <20121121201416.1015.36832.stgit@brno.lan> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121121201416.1015.36832.stgit@brno.lan> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:14:16 +0000") Message-ID: <87zk24id5w.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Let me know if you see an issue with this. No issues, I think this approach is clearly better. Starting with Emacs 24, only --fullname is used. So, all the level >= 2 annotations will be dead at some point. Tom