From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-96343-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11497 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2012 20:14:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 11475 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2012 20:14:25 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:14:22 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARKEM4T027525	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:14:22 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARKELh7029322	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:14:21 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<87mwyiy8hi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A6755C.8040607@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:14:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <50A6755C.8040607@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 16	Nov 2012 17:18:20 +0000")
Message-ID: <87zk22by76.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00781.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
>> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.

Pedro> It's not pointless in gdbserver.  The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
Pedro> the WinCE port.  See fe7cf52e.

Thanks.
I think I will just drop this patch from the series.

Tom