From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2013 19:34:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 21150 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2013 19:34:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:34:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0JJYH5Y028344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:34:17 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0JJYFh6008840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:34:16 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR c++/14999 References: <87mwwj38hm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130119155435.GA5215@adacore.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130119155435.GA5215@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:54:35 +0400") Message-ID: <87zk053r2g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 Joel> Unfortunately, this patch causes a number of regressions which do Joel> appear with the testsuite if you run it with gdbserver. Oops, sorry, Joel. I should have dug deeper. Joel> I don't really understand the code well enough to be sure about Joel> my fix, in particular what the "loc" parameter is about, but Joel> the attached patch seems to restore the origin behavior while Joel> still keeping your new testcase happy. Feel free to kick regressions back to me. Tom