From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28201 invoked by alias); 7 May 2013 14:26:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28169 invoked by uid 89); 7 May 2013 14:26:34 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 14:26:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r47EQVYG006344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 May 2013 10:26:31 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-163.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.163]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r47EQTpw024257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2013 10:26:30 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [RFA 2/3] Improve output of "maintenance info sol-threads" command. References: <518284AF.5090802@redhat.com> <1367929532-4849-3-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1367929532-4849-3-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 7 May 2013 08:25:31 -0400") Message-ID: <87zjw6vpbe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> * sol-thread.c (info_cb): Rework the output of the "maintenance Joel> info sol-threads" command a bit. Joel> I could probably commit this one without approval, but someone else's Joel> thoughts would be welcome, since this is a bit cosmetic. FWIW it seems fine to me. Tom