From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11709 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 10:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11696 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2014 10:31:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.111) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 08 May 2014 10:31:38 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 8 May 2014 11:31:34 +0100 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 8 May 2014 11:31:32 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01012190056 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 11:31:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.250]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s48AVWOK57081884 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 10:31:32 GMT Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s48AVVl3011606 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 04:31:31 -0600 Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-188.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.188]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s48AVUTQ011579; Thu, 8 May 2014 04:31:31 -0600 From: Andreas Arnez To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: , Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: [RFC 00/23] Regset rework preparations References: <87eh0h6bkq.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <87d2g11n2z.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 10:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87d2g11n2z.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (Andreas Arnez's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:38:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87zjis5zp9.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14050810-0342-0000-0000-000008B03A64 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 28 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> >>> Note that all architecture-specific changes except for S390 are >>> completely untested. >> >> I realise you may have troubles regression testing the load of targets, >> but please at least build patched GDB with the `--enable-64-bit-bfd >> --enable-targets=all' configure options supplied. Without that step I >> cannot approve the 06/23 MIPS part (although offhand it looks good). >> Thanks for your contribution to the GDB project. > > Sorry, I failed to mention it, but I built after each patch with > --enable-targets=all on a 64-bit system. > > By "untested" I meant that I didn't run the patched gdb on any targets > other than s390. I guess that satisfies your request? Please let me know if you have any other comments to patch 06/23 (or to any other patch in the series).