From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9111 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2019 16:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9097 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2019 16:59:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: gateway30.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway30.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway30.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.197.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:59:25 +0000 Received: from cm12.websitewelcome.com (cm12.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.8]) by gateway30.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77442E745 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:59:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id hHCOg0PCKiQerhHCOg1ozF; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:59:24 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3qBKVLsWLwN5oz59eA7ew3tzaqr+RT+lG7CTWUjX+Hs=; b=Uw5xIV7nFUzp139yZ3lpuIHwnv zxmFvLt1NkIpxyGkeATsKRQ24e25rX5iQXr1eKBg8GGh1xWG21b5V7iHzh+P+vC9uquCdktr1L6aG t1Bo805tO8GZHAZsTOvLvcuWb; Received: from 75-166-72-210.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.72.210]:40424 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1ghHCO-003UkH-6L; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:59:24 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: Simon Marchi , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Remove support for old mangling schemes References: <20190108232208.17487-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Keith Seitz's message of "Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:24:51 -0800") Message-ID: <87zhs9py1g.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> The manual talks about several demangling-related features which Keith> raised questions for me about the general support for gnu-v2 code. If Keith> libiberty is removing support for v2 demangling, how useful will GDB be Keith> without the ability to demangle v2 symbols? Should we deprecate or remove Keith> that, too? /me opens can of worms I tend to think removing the GNU v2 ABI support would be fine. It's long since obsolete. If someone out there still requires gcc 2.95, I suppose they can either build an old gdb as well, or use "set lang c". Tom