From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id affLCkNbEmmr0jMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:38:11 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=stackframe.org header.i=@stackframe.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=duo-1634547266507-560c42ae header.b=IRB25eFE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=outbound.mailhop.org header.i=@outbound.mailhop.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim-high header.b=NMLALNu8; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=stackframe.org header.i=@stackframe.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim1 header.b=CLDeehi2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 09C5D1E04C; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:38:11 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9AE1E04C for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:38:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DCD3858C51 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:38:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 16DCD3858C51 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, secure) header.d=stackframe.org header.i=@stackframe.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=duo-1634547266507-560c42ae header.b=IRB25eFE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=outbound.mailhop.org header.i=@outbound.mailhop.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim-high header.b=NMLALNu8; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key, secure) header.d=stackframe.org header.i=@stackframe.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim1 header.b=CLDeehi2 Received: from outbound1g.eu.mailhop.org (outbound1g.eu.mailhop.org [52.28.6.212]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C743858C74 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:34:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 66C743858C74 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stackframe.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=stackframe.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 66C743858C74 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=52.28.6.212 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1762810446; cv=none; b=DK0P2CGAdJPQDbArbPPIS76acEpDpvIybn0s+6pVIGK/L5DSPOlHenvQAIsivdhv1PshCeyKvDBrY0MFPOu/OljLiSAr+jBpEsaZgLtW6zv2NVrd75tAaSPFbLgIgFUkP/p1Yip+JDqDuugJhgPE7bdiZ10Ownia5TacnVOT8dU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1762810446; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qO1uqey9ZnXSZNYIYLgDyRELSAiU50ifF4ZdhKPR7nQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=APMEOtc44sYmn8+kzKEm0AhnXCTw2eosKo6KOdvcq/NuQE1HIOz6Bniz9j58DmMou4TYZhzKxq9+l/hKwo+Ax0MXyDZRYkWgEBhuf6geHY3cWmr20W8TvCgpQWjQTf0Qjsy6B/HgD92F8vKBYLAM8s/2qs6GxQwKaqU3h159R0o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66C743858C74 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stackframe.org; s=duo-1634547266507-560c42ae; h=content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:cfbl-address:cfbl-feedback-id:from; bh=rSKUpIPvnB/IbfxCEVnvhnPWDO6so5Mm6po0RNONMOE=; b=IRB25eFEHievYnrwgn1V6Srlikqqpf7uVtefxQQQzLqOBbrQOsqNCdVEI/KTQv/n7ZS1JYM+GNy8k IbWAAXa7BNoeG945IxcST34h9VhO+F9bylruLmg30nXzT5K7I68tZiAEnQEZfOy2oxwZT2KTDfhWak w52jCWS0vrVDH/W8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outbound.mailhop.org; s=dkim-high; h=content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:cfbl-address:cfbl-feedback-id:from; bh=rSKUpIPvnB/IbfxCEVnvhnPWDO6so5Mm6po0RNONMOE=; b=NMLALNu84XmKBGp+eTlhWmaboYqIzOeMxcT0WhJaWfJy7rVbrZO6Yql9VBBF7WBCfDem2iDO92R2f ZZ8tM/bdeNbnzGjgSxkaKkKNa2AoA5kXiFyl2A2XkjDl9MWr1UkHKdQCFtUzay5OO1j3eCQubRM+6C v+qKKIjqcZ4lvcSA8kdT4L9T9rG1VKc78Ulw80GKx7vxBlxK9/dUkkmgqLjgTfN+5JPy5VbUiW5FuX QOmfsr9afM+jU32jPNUBQTiJwIVFatkBfE2IxXY4SLS0Otsg3Js2okBYxhfSJyvIp05d28QHuajna1 04jPYaPy/okZzH/JAtvru21VIwH7MoQ== X-Originating-IP: 130.180.31.158 X-MHO-RoutePath: dG9ta2lzdG5lcm51 X-MHO-User: f9042e44-be7c-11f0-b95c-5f56af36decb X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP CFBL-Feedback-ID: f9042e44-be7c-11f0-b95c-5f56af36decb:9 CFBL-Address: prvs=040923d279=abuse@outbound.mailhop.org; report=arf Received: from mail.duncanthrax.net (mail.duncanthrax.net [130.180.31.158]) by outbound3.eu.mailhop.org (Halon) with ESMTPSA id f9042e44-be7c-11f0-b95c-5f56af36decb; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:34:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stackframe.org; s=dkim1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rSKUpIPvnB/IbfxCEVnvhnPWDO6so5Mm6po0RNONMOE=; b=CLDeehi2IBUx2Df7hRg/3aie7Q XiMiVi+t1EGBMl69ohxq0sxEXVY+6G0ePspqa/HYpZHrHsH2h7X6dvG+mmVhhdFgcj7n3sBjhNBzy lisNPG9NMMnuFCo2wxoGkKv3Ysla3/BxQiSAOFTFMFxXvM/w6/35/R3Dt3HX6S4c2WGQzAgjxR9qN 7ANQwkMWN7QzQZ3WoL/R3vigk8kXA99gQapOwHLD7INhVQopJ/545KWc2DSOMF60WocLyRuVBKoMT leSzMitvJXgSO5TGjjjlCF+FAc46t9ruwT1D92XiOJ8To2imq+Oy5wq3onuQKBoLjfFPR1143sCj6 A7vdpLww==; Received: from [134.3.93.166] (helo=debian.stackframe.org) by mail.duncanthrax.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1vIZWS-00000005pay-473J; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:34:01 +0100 From: Sven Schnelle To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Helge Deller , John David Anglin , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb/hppa: guess g packet size In-Reply-To: (Simon Marchi's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:29:33 -0500") References: <20251110210717.152087-1-svens@stackframe.org> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 22:34:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87zf8th8s7.fsf@stackframe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Simon Marchi writes: >> + warning (_("target returned a target description this gdb doesn't " >> + "support for the HP/PA architecture")); > > Good idea to put out a warning. I would suggesting some minor changes > to the message: > > warning (_("The target returned a target description but this gdb " > "doesn't support target descriptions for the HP/PA > "architecture")); > > Just thinking out loud: it would actually be nice to have this warning > for all architectures that don't support target descriptions, if there > was a way to put it at a single common place. > > Other than that, the patch looks fine. > > Approved-By: Simon Marchi > > Do you have push access or would you like me to push the patch on your > behalf (with the modification proposed above)? I don't have push acess - would appreciate if you could adjust the message and push it.