From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4359 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2012 17:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 4349 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2012 17:51:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:51:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1SHp3GH005039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:51:03 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1SHp3gF027645; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:51:03 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1SHp2je019355; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:51:02 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR breakpoints/13776 References: <878vjmswbr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <878vjmswbr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:26:48 -0700") Message-ID: <87y5rmrgmx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00666.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I'd appreciate comments on this patch. Tom> I have no idea whether it is the best way to fix the problem. I somehow forgot to turn the test case into a patch against the test suite. So, please look at the patch; but know that I will not check anything in until the test case is written up. thanks, Tom