From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12619 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2012 14:20:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 12610 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2012 14:20:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:20:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q22EJum3014498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:19:56 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q22EJsaH023789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:19:55 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 1/3] language-specific read_var_value for Ada renamings References: <1330546034-27156-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1330546034-27156-2-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <87vcmodrqr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120301225827.GC2853@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120301225827.GC2853@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:58:27 -0800") Message-ID: <87y5rjccfp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> In this case, I'd rather continue pushing for standard DWARF, and just Joel> get rid of the encoding altogether... Yeah, that would be clearly better. And at least in the case arising in this thread, simple to do as well. Tom