From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3158 invoked by alias); 16 May 2012 18:36:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3110 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2012 18:36:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 18:36:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4GIa0HF016317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 May 2012 14:36:20 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4GHDIf8032695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 May 2012 13:13:19 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Thomas Schwinge , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Buettner , "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [SH] regs command References: <87ehqkrzzw.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120516142633.GV10253@adacore.com> <87zk98qe8t.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120516165730.GY10253@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120516165730.GY10253@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 16 May 2012 09:57:30 -0700") Message-ID: <87y5osoxqp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Can you use add_alias_cmd instead of add_com? I was going to make the same comment :) Joel> The only think I am not Joel> sure about is whether it is going to work with the deprecation mechanism. It should. Tom