From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7688 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 15:15:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7678 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2012 15:15:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:15:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEFExGi006707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:14:59 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEFEvMo026711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:14:58 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Yao Qi , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: crash/regression with ia64 targets References: <1353404184-22073-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <50AFD573.1090601@gmail.com> <50B0ABF9.1080606@codesourcery.com> <20121213120528.GA19986@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121213120528.GA19986@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:05:28 +0400") Message-ID: <87y5h01x8u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> This patch also begs the question whether we might want to Joel> move init_entry_point_info to objfiles.c and make it static. It seems like a good idea to me. (I think you meant symfile.c here.) Tom