From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20633 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2013 20:59:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 20624 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2013 20:59:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:59:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r11KxCjo029667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:59:12 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r11KxAx1011966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:59:11 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patchv3 12/11] New options {relative,basename}-with-system-absolute References: <20130129221019.GA27463@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130130074820.GA15998@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130130074820.GA15998@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:48:20 +0100") Message-ID: <87y5f73g4h.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> So a combination of absolute filenames for system component and relative Jan> filenames for user binaries should be the best of both choices. FWIW I think this makes sense. Tom