From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9615 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2013 18:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 9582 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2013 18:52:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:52:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1LIqVYV032313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:52:31 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1LIqU0D004028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:52:30 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix gdb.texinfo for Texinfo 5.0 References: <877gm1d7nm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <8338wpo946.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8338wpo946.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:43:53 +0200") Message-ID: <87y5ehbitt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Tom> The fix for the first problem is to just remove the @table. Tom> There's no need for it. Eli> It's possible that someone used this trick to get the text indented. Eli> All of those instances are around @defXXX directives, so perhaps Eli> someone didn't like how functions/methods/etc. look unless indented. Eli> But if you are satisfied by the results of removing @table in those Eli> cases, that's fine by me. Yeah, I think it looks ok. Tom> The fix for the second was to use @w{} as the argument to @item. Eli> Yes, Texinfo 5.0 replaced one ugly kludge with another, sigh. Eli> (We left the @item empty because we wanted `' in the manual, by virtue Eli> of "@table @samp".) It took me a while to find @w{}. Eli> P.S. I recommend everybody not to use makeinfo 5 yet, since it's Eli> dog-slow. I renamed it to 'makeinfo5' and keep the old v4.13a Eli> executable around, because it is 30 times faster, and that really Eli> shows when processing such a large manual. I noticed that too. It is really noticeably slower. I just did this because Texinfo 5 is in the Fedora build root, and I thought it would be good for gdb to be warning-free there. Tom