From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22422 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2013 18:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22409 invoked by uid 89); 7 Oct 2013 18:53:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:53:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r97IqxJJ028308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:52:59 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r97Iqwqi001279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:52:58 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: endianness in gnu_vector.exp References: <87bo31m9r7.fsf@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87bo31m9r7.fsf@oracle.com> (Jose E. Marchesi's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:33:00 +0200") Message-ID: <87y564kj5i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jose" == Jose E Marchesi writes: Jose> Small patch making gnu_vector.exp to work properly in big-endian Jose> machines. The patch looks reasonable enough, but is this how casting to vector types works? That is, is the gdb result here consistent with what gcc does? This isn't clear from the existing test. Tom