From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3236 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2014 16:48:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3227 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2014 16:48:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:48:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s06Gmi6h010158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:48:44 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s06GmfpW031289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:48:42 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: David Edelsohn Cc: Yao Qi , GDB Patches , Joel Brobecker , Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cast to uintptr_t when calling ptrace32 on aix References: <52CA02FE.6060804@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (David Edelsohn's message of "Sun, 5 Jan 2014 20:21:01 -0500") Message-ID: <87y52tnjiu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 >>>>> "David" == David Edelsohn writes: David> I meant it would be nice to encapsulate this in one file instead of David> defining ptrace32, ptrace64, ptracex, etc. multiple times in multiple David> files. It appears that you are performing the same cast as Joel, so it David> should be correct. It would be nice to use a consistent syntax. But it David> would be even nicer to do this only once. Yeah, I agree. IIRC we've run into this in another spot as well. Tom